I have kringed at all this forking talk, whining about this feature or
that feature, but I have to admit I like this approach.  This reminds
me more of the StarOffice/OpenOffice way of doing things.  That
relationship seems to be fruitful for all.  This could have pitfalls,
but would solve alot of this strife, as well as give a more
experimental outlet for all the pent up energy.

Good idea Darrell!

JP

----- Original Message -----
From: "Darrell May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "e-smith-devinfo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 3:17 PM
Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] development roadmap


>
> I want to take a moment to thank Dan for doing an excellent job on
moving
> SME forward with PHP and IMP upgrades.  In my book, this is exactly
what is
> needed.
>
> To continue this fine effort I thought we, the community, should
produce
> our own development roadmap and issue our own development iso.  Lets
hear
> everyone's thoughts on where we want to take SME server.
>
> DEVELOPMENT ROADMAP IDEAS:
>
> Stage 1: Get SME _current_ with core apps and devinfo contribs and
release
> a development iso.
>
> IMP
> PHP
> SAMBA
> CONTRIBS - make a list of contribs we want included and installed by
> default in our development iso.  I think this area has been
overlooked.
> There are so many fine contribs and they are not making it into the
standard
> SME release.  We need to get these part of the iso.
>
> It would be preferable if Mitel gave us space to host our
development iso
> and src rpms.  Maybe they will comment on if this is feasable at
their end.
>
> Stage 2: Add journaling filesystem to our development iso.
>
> ReiserFS - could be added to current 2.2.19 kernel.  I do not
understand
> why are we not at least considering this?  Would this not keep
everyone who
> wants to stay with the 2.2.x kernel and ipchains happy yet add a
journaling
> file system?  The only negative I can see is ext2 > ReiserFS upgrade
path
> may not be feasible and we would need to do a fresh install with
restore.
>
> EXT3 - breaks software RAID1 under 2.2.x kernel so must be
implemented on
> 2.4.x kernel
>
> Stage 3: Kernel 2.4.x development iso
> EXT3
> IPTABLES
> all the other current bells and whistles
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Darrell May
> DMC Netsourced.com
> http://netsourced.com
> http://myEZserver.com
>
>
> --
> Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
> Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives by mail and
http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
>
>
>


--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to