Charlie, Is this due to be posted today, or am I just missing it?
Thanks Garret Charlie Brady wrote: >On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Charlie Brady wrote: > >>>We have managed to get 1.3.2-5 working, but 2.x has many advances. It >>>would be nice to get this one figured out. >>> >>If there is no suitable binary RPM available, then rebuilding the ntop 2 >>source RPM on a RH7.1 box (or MEE5 + dev tools boox) should give you a >> > >That should have said "SME5 + dev tools box". > >>working RPM. >> > >There should now (or soon) be a suitable ntop RPM in my contrib directory. >You'll need the libpcap RPM from RH7.1. > > > -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
