On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:24:51AM +0200, Jaime Nebrera Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > Yes we see it. Actually, and that is my fault, when I saw the 5.6 > announcement I didn't read it too much as I thought it was "hi guys, we have > a new release but still uses 2.2 kernels, no iptables, no journalling system > ..." Please, dont you think such changes are so important that it should be > called SME 6.0 and not 5.6? Even without adding any new service is a very big > change. (I didnt read the post because it was 5.6 not 6.0 Surelly if I see > announcement: SME 6.0alpha ... I would just jump into the message :)) > [...]
We had planned for the next release after 5.5 (which would include new product features and the 2.4 kernel) to be 6.0 but needed to bring out an earlier release for some specific hardware support for two of our projects. We may have been able to do that under the 2.2 kernel, but it was time to move. The only change (and, yes it is a big one) other than bug fixes from 5.5 to 5.6 is the kernel. Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director, Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com/ Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/smallbusiness -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
