On Saturday 31 August 2002 20:07, you wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 08:39:42PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote: > > On Saturday 31 August 2002 14:41, you wrote: > > > So an alternate date format may make sense... how about > > > > > > /DATE@YYYYMMDD/SSK@...? SSK@blah/blah@YYYYMMDD ? @ is reserved in keys, > > > isn't it? > > > > This looks confusing to me. I wouldn't use the @ symbol. That already > > has a meaning. > > > > Whats wrong with: > > > > /__DATE__YYYYMMDD/SSK%40rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE// > > > > or maybe something like this since DBR's can have periods shorter than 1 > > day. > > > > /__DATE__YYYYMMDDHHMM/SSK%40rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE// > > It's ugly. Really really ugly. I don't think it's ugly or I wouldn't have suggested it. However if you are willing to implement it, I don't care how you do it as long as you don't change the anonymity filter.
You do probably want minute resolution for the DBR time though. --gj _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
