On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:56:27PM +0200, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > > ... > > =2E..ok, I am only kidding - but now that the datastore has been replaced,= > >=20 > >hopefully it will soon be stable (Matthew is fixing a bug a minute by the l= > >ooks=20 > >of it) - the last remaining excuse for not releasing the laughably overdue = > >0.5=20 > >are no longer valid. > > > >So, if you think you have a really good reason why we shouldn't bump the=20 > >version to 0.5 when the native datastore has proven itself, speak now or=20 > >forever hold your peace. > > Just this; is fproxy usable via SSL tunnel ? > > This is probably trivial from a software point of view, but > mandatory from an application security point of view. > > If we are concerned about people using IE to browse Freenet with fproxy, > we must have a bigger concern for people doing it using http and not > https. > > Maybe a good idea will be put the same kind of warning message when > fproxy is used via http. > > This is the only doubt I have; I'll not have time to check > this myself until next week. Eh? People will run a node locally. If they don't run a permanent node locally they have no security anyway. So what's the point of SSL? > > JM2C Marco > > > -- > * Marco A. Calamari [EMAIL PROTECTED] * > > il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco > the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit > > > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
msg04112/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
