Reproduce it on logLevel=debug and mail me the log (compressed)...
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:44:19AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: > Should the NativeBuffer be pointing to temp-files? Could it be this that is > causing those 'failed to delete temp file' messages over here? > > /N > > ul 16, 2003 10:10:06 AM (freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$NativeBuffer, > QThread-822, NORMAL): While deleting, didn't exist: > store\temp\temp-3ef91cb5b94907db-1-e7c7cba8b641205c2a0f0a8dbf6b711edb2de0a80 > f0203 - either it was deleted by the user or there is a bug. Please report > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > freenet.fs.dir.DirectoryException: backtrace > at > freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$NativeBuffer.releaseInternal(NativeFSDirect > ory.java:2465) > at > freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$NativeBuffer.release(NativeFSDirectory.java > :2297) > at freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory.writeIndex(NativeFSDirectory.java:1007) > at freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory.checkpoint(NativeFSDirectory.java:1464) > at > freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.checkpoint(Checkpoint.java:56) > at freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.received(Checkpoint.java:49) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:168) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:55) > at > freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.run(StandardMessageHandler.java:2 > 10) > at > freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.received(StandardMessageHandler.j > ava:157) > at > freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.access$0(StandardMessageHandler.j > ava:137) > at > freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler.handle(StandardMessageHandler.java:67) > at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:256) > at freenet.thread.QThreadFactory$QThread.run(QThreadFactory.java:214) > > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
