On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:02:49PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On July 22, 2003 02:38 pm, Toad wrote: > > > > This is basicily what the current code tries to do. Quite probably I > > > should make nodes that do not have connection have a very low CP. Note > > > about the only thing CP is used for the NG code to to drop nodes (and > > > give the sort order for the display servlet). > > > > Drop nodes? We don't drop nodes based on CP, do we? > > > > Yes the current NG code commits this sin. Suggestions on what will work > better would be nice. First though is to use the time it takes nodes to > retrieve keys to drop from the RT - syspect this would tend to overload > nodes though.
Well, we need to scrap all code related to CP - it is pure alchemy and is neatly obsoleted by NGR. Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Founder, Locutus http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
