-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| Okay, what should we set the unstable lastGoodBuild to? |
Someone on here if you're going to run unstable, use at least build 6215, so how about that build?
Or maybe a different scheme could be used? Perhaps some kind of "version affinity" scheme, where nodes would tend to route to other nodes with versions closer to their own (but not all). Perhaps maybe the first 10 in the routing table would aggressively seek version close to their own (say, within 5), the second 10 would be a little more lax and might seek, (maybe within 10), the next 10 version might seek within 20 versions, the next 10 would seek something in the same branch, and the last 10 are "don't care" entries (which would accept any version up to lastKnownBuild, stable or unstable)
The way the newest nodes would be better well-connect (and if NGR is working, probably preferable to route through), without splitting the Freenet network in 2. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/gvIdhctESbvQ8ZwRAks4AJwNE3E+66WhLJis4ExpedO9mqiC+QCeP153 SF0W/bacFmg6VaRikfPOLRI= =Vkdl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
