On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 08:43:35AM -0700, Todd Walton wrote: > On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > For the stable merge of the current unstable code, which will likely be > > 5029, we should consider the benefits of increasing lastGoodBuild to > > 5029. Some say that 5028 is next to useless, however some of the best > > nodes in routing tables I have seen are 5028 nodes - so perhaps not. > > If you set lastGoodBuild in 5029 to 5029, then new builds will have no one > to talk to. Better to set lastGoodBuild to 5028, and then, if warranted, > set lastGoodBuild in 5030 to 5029.
They can route to old nodes, just not accept queries from them. > > -todd -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
