On 5/21/2020 2:44 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
One concern here is that these responses are scattered across different parts of
a long discussion thread. So it probably would be a good idea for the
acceptance to be accompanied by an explanation of what the major objections were
to the DIP, and why they were discounted.
It's not so different from the way that, at the end of a talk or presentation,
it's a good idea to recap the key points that have already been covered.
Fair enough. I'll do so. Stay tuned.
