On 10.08.2010 02:59, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, August 09, 2010 17:45:07 simendsjo wrote:
translate does this:
bool[256] deltab; // this would make all values of deltab false as
bool.init == false, right?
deltab[] = false;
Isn't this just initializing all values of deltab to false twice..?
I believe that you are correct and that the array is getting set twice.
[snip]...
I confess that it's entirely irrational on my part given that D is smart enough
that a post-increment where the temporary is not used should be just as
efficient
as a pre-increment (even in the face of operator overloading - unlike C++), but
it always makes me cringe to see post-increments where a pre-increment would
do...
- Jonathan M Davis
Yeah. Don't remember when, don't remember where, but I too have read
that preincrement is faster (PS: I don't know any assembler!).
As long as I don't use it in an expression, I always use post-increment
as it shouldn't make a difference.
