On 4/12/11, bearophile <[email protected]> wrote: > Template functions may not require a bang+types if argument > types can be inferred from the given arguments.
So isn't the string literal a candidate in this case?
On 4/12/11, bearophile <[email protected]> wrote: > Template functions may not require a bang+types if argument > types can be inferred from the given arguments.
So isn't the string literal a candidate in this case?