On 06/25/2012 05:52 PM, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 25 June 2012 at 15:39:19 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/25/2012 02:18 PM, Namespace wrote:
Fine. But nothing of them explain the Stack overflow if i add an
additional method or disable/add an additional ctor.
It does not have to be explained: it is a compiler bug.
Then it will take months or years until it is fixed ... too bad.
Many of them get fixed quite fast if they are reported properly.
And that Ref!(Foo) rf = new Foo(); ends even with "Stack overflow" and
Ref!(Foo) rf2 = new Ref!(Foo)(new Foo()); not has the same explanation
"Compiler Bug", hm?
It is always a compiler bug if compilation crashes.
