Michel Fortin, el 12 de abril a las 12:54 me escribiste:
> On 2009-04-12 11:09:51 -0400, Lars Kyllingstad <pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet>
> said:
>
> >Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >>Lars Kyllingstad wrote:
> >>>I think isInfinite!() should be called isInfiniteRange!(). The current
> >>>name is, in my opinion, too general.
> >>I'm undecided about this (and similar cases). isInfinite sits inside
> >>std.range, so std.range.isInfinite is clear and std.range.isInfiniteRange
> >>feels
> >>redundant. On the other hand, I don't want to use too common symbols
> >>because then the user will be forced to prefix them whenever they clash.
> >I'm not too worried about name clashes, I just think it sounds wrong. If R
> >is a range with infinitely many elements, I think it's more correct to say
> >"R is
> >an infinite range" than to say "R is infinite".
> >As an example of what I mean, let the range R be the sequence 1, 1/4, 1/9,
> >...:
> > alias Sequence!("1/(n*n)", 1) R
> >Then, isInfiniteRange!(R) should obviously yield true. From a mathematical
> >standpoint, I think the result of isInfinite!(R) is less obvious. Yes, the
> >range
> >has infinitely many elements, but none of them are infinite, nor is their
> >sum infinite.
>
> Perhaps it should be renamed to isUnbounded then.
I was about to write exaclty the same suggestion. I'm glad I read the
responses before posting =)
--
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you don't know what direction you should take
You don't know where you are
