Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: ... > Now onto why ref was disallowed to bind to an rvalue. This is because > some functions take things by ref intending to change them. Passing an > rvalue is in such cases a bug. > > I agree there are functions that only want to use ref for speed > purposes. I suggested Walter to use ref? for those. ref? means it could > be an rvalue or an lvalue. > > > Andrei
Since passing by const ref cannot change the parameter, is it possible to allow that for rvalues?
