On Tuesday, 1 April 2014 at 21:34:29 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 April 2014 at 18:35:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
2. The latter function wins, no wonder though, since there's no
branching. (I tried to augment it by actually using the cache
in between, but it still wins against my attempts so far.)
The "it" being augmented is the benchmark, the "it" winning being
the function isIdentifierChar2.
This modification of the benchmark pretends to use a
stack-allocated array alongside calling the funcions of interest:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/1ed247445308
The timings are:
Milliseconds 623 590 229
Milliseconds 629 592 231
Milliseconds 619 596 233
Milliseconds 524 592 283
Funnily, on DPaste, the picture changes:
Milliseconds 1864 1349 1303
Perhaps there is no "-O -release -inline -noboundscheck" tuning
there.
Ivan Kazmenko.
