On 10/3/14, 11:28 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 05:58:47 +0000
Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>
wrote:

Nah, it is a matter of ad hoc design and implementation that
needs more rigour.
something like 'final try' can be fun. 'try' says that it can catch
only some kinds of exceptions, and 'final try' promises that there will
be no exceptions that aren't in catch() block.

besides, any exception that 'final try' is not catching should abort
the process.

do you mind to fill ER? it will be rejected, but hey, we can start a
little competiion here! ;-)

There's no interesting way to check this because functions don't list the exceptions they might throw (like Java does). -- Andrei

Reply via email to