On 12/4/2014 5:32 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
http://www.teamten.com/lawrence/writings/java-for-everything.html
i didn't read the article, but i bet that this is just another article
about his language of preference and how any other language he tried
doesn't have X or Y or Z. and those X, Y and Z are something like "not
being on market for long enough", "vendor ACME didn't ported ACMElib to
it", "out staff is trained in G but not in M" and so on. boring.
From the article:
"Most importantly, the kinds of bugs that people introduce most often aren’t the
kind of bugs that unit tests catch. With few exceptions (such as parsers), unit
tests are a waste of time."
Not my experience with unittests, repeated over decades and with different
languages. Unit tests are a huge win, even with statically typed languages.
