On 2014-12-06 10:50, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I've been over it so many times.
I suggest you take the time and write down how your vision of "ref" looks like and the issue with the current implementation. A blog post, a DIP or similar. Then you can easily refer to that in cases like this. Then you don't have to repeat yourself so many times. That's what I did when there was a lot of talk about AST macros. I was tired of constantly repeating myself so I created a DIP. It has already saved me more time than it took to write the actual DIP.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
