On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 21:19:35 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 19:30:59 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 18:25:39 UTC,
francesco.cattoglio wrote:
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 14:10:56 UTC, ponce wrote:
None of them has Visual Studio integration with debugging
support and that is pretty important for native and
enterprise programmers.
If I remember correctly, just 2 month ago someone was
explaining
how they lost a commercial user because D debugging experience
was still not good enough by a long shot. And in my daily use,
debug experience is still subpar on windows.
only to discover it is not fun enough and fun is more
important than "memory safety without GC".
WHAT? Syntax is boring, but I don't get the sense of the
sentence
Right, might be personal judgement, at this point I was in
rant-mode. :)
Rust is supposed to replace C++, and it happens working in C++
since years, I can't help but notice we actually have very few
memory safety problems, to the point that I question that it's
something worth worrying about....[cutted]
Somehow I feel you are in the very lucky position of having top
notch colleagues, with small attrition in team members and
budget to buy C++ sanitation tools.
Accurate. Actually C++ is pretty much a non-problem around here,
not my experience in other C++ shops.
