Walter Bright Wrote: > Adam Ruppe wrote: > > My network thing is very simple: it opens a socket, then wraps it up > > in a File struct, via FILE*. Then, you can treat it the same way. > > That's the traditional way to do it, but I'm not so sure it's the right way > for > the future. Wouldn't it be better to have an interface to it that is a range, > rather than pretend it's a FILE* ?
And in either case, if the buffer is empty a get() operation will block, correct?
