On 02/15/2011 11:24 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Is there some low level reason why size_t should be signed or something I'm
completely missing?
My personal issue with unsigned ints in general as implemented in C-like
languages is that the range of non-negative signed integers is half of the
range of corresponding unsigned integers (for same size).
* practically: known issues, and bugs if not checked by the language
* conceptually: contradicts the "obvious" idea that unsigned (aka naturals) is
a subset of signed (aka integers)
denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
