On 23/02/2011 18:07, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 2/22/11 10:36 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
%u Wrote:
Well, the trouble is, pretty much all of these are invalid attributes:
- static obviously makes no sense
And here is where you're wrong. You have defined a static destructor, which is
called
with module destructor as the program goes out of scope, rather than when your
struct or
class is destroyed.
This is why attributes that make no sense must be an error: you don't know if
an attribute
you put is being ignored by the compiler or not (like what has just happened
here).
Uh, that's a total non sequitur. The point Simen is making is that static _does_ make
sense here.
Stewart.
