On 4/6/12 3:54 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/6/2012 12:49 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:What about type declarations? I think those ought to be supported too. E.g. it makes sense to mark an entire type as @attr(serializable) (or the inverse).That would make it a "type constructor", not a storage class, which we talked about earlier in the thread. I refer you to that discussion.
What's the difference between "type constructor" and "storage class" beside the name?
