Hello,
 
I am a research student and about to wrap up my work. This is a timely 
discussion for me because I am exactly in the same situation.  My research is 
related to collaborative problem-solving support. To be precise, I am working 
on a 'system' (synchronous/same time-same place) for knowledge capture, 
management, and ussage to support collaborative problem solving and also 
support related dynamics such as rationale of the session and 
shared-understanding of the problem/perspectives.
 
Now, I have proposed  data structure/ process flow/architecture/interactions 
etc. I get in to trouble when I like to test the system. I have been using 
low-fidility prototypes (paper-based) and results are always dealt with a sense 
of doubt.
 
I will appreciate any views or directions to clear my confusion.
 
Regards,
Nishchal> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:06:19 +0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [IxDA Discuss] Design 
Masters Thesis & Extent of Realization> > Hi Jack,> > I did my Masters by 
research actually, and I thought I would provide> my 2 cents. ;P> > The 
question in my view is not about a finished product ready to be> launched and 
used, as that goes beyond the research area, and involves> other items that are 
more inline to business.> > It all depends on the expectations and purpose of 
the thesis. Usually> it is bring you through the process of research and second 
your> research questions.> > > >From a process perspective, a theory only 
research would do, no need> to proof practically if your research is 
applicable.> > >From a research standpoint, the question is has the thesis 
questions> been answered using the work that has been created.> > I would think 
you would need to create a prototype that can show how> it can and will
  be used and how it answers your questions you started> out with.> > But, 
without a usable prototype it would be hard to show how your> research can help 
and does solve the questions.> > But I have read a lot of research papers which 
are very much theory> based without any practical implementations or minimal 
emphasis on> them.> > Regards,> > Jay Kumar> > On 12/13/07, Jack Moffett 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > I took part yesterday in a Thesis Committee 
meeting for a student> > working on a project for her Masters degree in design. 
She is> > designing a website with the purpose of facilitating a community for> 
> female cancer victims. There was a fair amount of discussion> > surrounding 
how far she must take the project to be granted the> > degree. There were 
faculty members on the committee from other visual> > arts disciplines, and 
they expect a thesis project to result in a> > finished work of art. There was 
some discomfort in the suggestion that> > the website would 
 not have to be implemented and put into use for her> > to complete her thesis 
and her degree.> >> > While the student very much wants to build and launch the 
site and is> > working on getting the sponsorship/funding and collaborators 
with the> > necessary skill sets to make it a reality, it is my own opinion 
that> > her thesis is much more about the process she followed and what she> > 
has learned than it is about the final artifact. I and the other> > design 
faculty argued that as long as the design was completed> > satisfactorily, she 
could deliver her thesis and receive her degree> > before implementation has 
finished.> >> > I know that when I was working on my own Masters degree, there 
was no> > expectation that my project would result in running software. With 
the> > advances in web application development in recent years, and with> > 
technologies such as Ruby on Rails and Flash making "running software"> > a 
more accessible possibility to those without a degree in soft
 ware> > engineering, I wonder if expectations are increasing.> >> > I'd like 
to hear what the IxDA community thinks about it.> >> > Best,> > Jack> >> >> >> 
> Jack L. Moffett> > Interaction Designer> > inmedius> > 412.459.0310 x219> > 
http://www.inmedius.com> >> >> > There is no good design that is not> > based 
on the understanding of people.> >> > - Stefano Marzano> > CEO of Philips 
Design> >> > ________________________________________________________________> 
> *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*> > February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, 
GA, USA> > Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/> >> > 
________________________________________________________________> > Welcome to 
the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!> > To post to this list ....... 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Unsubscribe ................ 
http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe> > List Guidelines ............ 
http://www.ixda.org/guidelines> > List Help .................. 
http://www.ixda.org/help> >> _______________________
 _________________________________________> *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | 
Savannah*> February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA> Register today: 
http://interaction08.ixda.org/> > 
________________________________________________________________> Welcome to 
the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!> To post to this list ....... [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe> List 
Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines> List Help 
.................. http://www.ixda.org/help
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
________________________________________________________________
*Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to