I will probably buy that one for me and shell to use and share, keeping the macbook for web things and messing with upstairs and in the garden.
On 29 Apr 2008, at 07:52, will lomas wrote:

why are all of you needing 3 ghz or more you are blind for god sake, not video editing professionals

On 29 Apr 2008, at 03:51, Larry Wanger wrote:

Man, what a beautiful machine. I'm in love! Too bad my current iMac isn't even 2 and 1/2 years old yet. I just can't justify it. But, in a few years we'll have a 5 GHZ machine and this will look old and slow.


DisabilityNation, an Audio Magazine by and for People with Disabilities. Listen at http://www.disabilitynation.net



On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Scott Howell wrote:

Oh man I just got to get me one of these. If I get a nice performance award, I guess I'll have to decide on referbing the house or getting a new Imac.:) Well hey I was only going to install some flooring so gee, it can wait.:)
On Apr 28, 2008, at 12:54 PM, David Poehlman wrote:

Yikes: Apple's iMac hits 3.06 GHz via SuperSite Blog by
pthurrott on 4/28/08
Regardless of your feelings about Apple, it's hard not to look at
almost any Apple hardware and not be impressed. The iMac is
particularly gorgeous now, though I do miss the gesticulating screen on the second generation version. This morning, Apple announced a small update to the iMac in that they're not changing the enclosure at all.
What they are offering however is a nifty speed bump to 3.06 GHz:

Apple today updated its all-in-one iMac line with the latest Intel Core 2 Duo processors and the most powerful graphics ever available in an
iMac. With prices starting at just $1,199, iMac includes faster
processors with 6MB L2 cache and a faster 1066 MHz front-side bus
across the entire line, and 2GB of memory standard in most models. The
24-inch iMac now offers a 3.06 GHz Intel processor and the
high-performance NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS graphics as options, extending
iMac’s lead as the ultimate all-in-one desktop computer for both
consumers and professionals.



Scott Howell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]










Reply via email to