On 19 Feb 2004, Grahame Bowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know this doesn't add any security if the local network is > compromised, however it should mean you can run distcc without anyone by > being able to just connect if they manage to get through your firewall. > Also, you don't take the speed hit assocciated with distcc over SSH.
I can kind of see your point. > Martin already said he'd never merge a patch like this - I'm still > willing to maintain it though :) Why don't you just use rsh? -- Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
