On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:58:13 -0700, Daniel Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suspect the timeout code in the new distcc is flawed and needs to be > rethought, but I haven't looked at it myself. Could it be done without > longjmp?
Yes, that seems to be the problem. I'll rewrite it without longjmp(). -- Martin __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
