>
>> References
>> ----------
>>
>> DMARC - http://dmarc.org
>> SPF - RFC7208
>> DKIM - RFC6376
>> Internet Message Format - RFC5322
>> OAR / Original Authentication Results -
>> draft-kucherawy-original-authres
>> Using DMARC - draft-crocker-dmarc-bcp-03
>
>
> This is missing two citations that I thought were supposed to be
> included, since they touch on indirect email flows:
>
> Delegating DKIM Signing Authority - draft-kucherawy-dkim-delegate-00
> DKIM Third-Party Authorization Label - draft-otis-dkim-tpa-label-03
Why not ATPS RFC6541 production?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6541
Consider ATPS the "lite version" of Doug's TPA. The same lookup hashing
algorithm is used in both. Further, there is real high quality commercial
"running code" implementations supporting rfc6541. All of our installations
have DKIM+ADSP+ATPS out of the box with their primary domain used for automated
first time setup plug and play readiness.
--
Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
