On Thursday, May 07, 2015 09:51:43 PM Hector Santos wrote: > On 5/7/2015 7:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > ATPS is assigned in the registry {1] as dkim-atps. > > As stated already, the work predated what Murray did after ATPS rev04. > > But its good to know that is this is the case and this is yet another > good reason to continue with ATPS work.
I'm really not sure what you're talking about (and equally not sure I need to), but in version -00 of the ATPS draft it already had: Method dkim-atps Defined In [THIS MEMO] ptype header property from If you want to document a ATPS result in an A-R header, there's a way to do it and that's how it should be done. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc