On 12/30/20 5:48 AM, Todd Herr wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 4:42 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it
<mailto:ves...@tana.it>> wrote:
On Tue 29/Dec/2020 22:02:20 +0100 Michael Thomas wrote:
> On 12/29/20 12:47 PM, Todd Herr wrote:
>>> Unless those values in parens are a MUST requirement, the
dmarc=fail is
>>> highly misleading.
I agree with Michael here. When a (trusted) dmarc=fail is seen
downstream, its consumers neither know what policy was specified
nor whether it was honored.
That depends on your definition of "downstream", I guess.
MDAs and local clients (web and mobile) at the mailbox provider will
have the information they need.
No they don't. I keep saying this, but you guys keep dismissing me.
Painting up "fail" for p=none is absolutely the wrong thing to do. It is
not what the user expects to see for a piece of mail that is perfectly
acceptable to the originating domain. This is an error or omission, full
stop.
Mike
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
