On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:33 PM Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com>
wrote:

>
> I've looked at it again and I think the paragraph can simply be deleted
> (see
> attached for rfcdiff).  It looks to me like this is addressed adequately
> in the
> main text of the section, which now includes:
>
> >    *  The RFC5321.MailFrom domain if there is an SPF pass result for the
> >       message.
> >
> >    *  Any DKIM d= domain if there is a DKIM pass result for the message
> >       for that domain.
>
> That adequately covers the question of if a tree walk is needed to find an
> SPF/
> DKIM related org domain.
>
>
Apologies for the delayed reply; I was away for a few days.

This will be updated in rev -08 when it's released.
-- 

*Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.h...@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to