On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2015 22 Mar 22:09 -0500, Peter Olson wrote: > > > On March 22, 2015 at 6:29 AM Jaromil <jaro...@dyne.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Peter Olson wrote: > > > > > > > RMS didn't call me a troll, he answered the question. Somebody else > > > > took it upon himself to refer to the question as trolling. I haven't > > > > decided yet whether to speak to that person tomorrow about it. > > > > > > Stefano refused my definition of bullying, which indeed may be debated. > > > > Stefano and I had an amicable conversation about the issue and I > > understand his point of view. > > That's one way, but how about the other, does he appreciate your POV or > does he still consider the question to be trolling?
On these regards Stefano wrote "troll as action != troll as a person" https://twitter.com/jaromil/status/579594919767064576 so he still considers the action of asking a systemd question to RMS to be trolling I think this is unacceptable under so many ways... some of which I've tried to explain. I'm also !flabbergasted! to see the discussion averted into the AST for GCC debacle with a touch of RMS bashing. Either someone is really missing the point of what is happening here, or really doesn't wants us to acknowledge that a Debian leader and OSI board member is acting this way, which I keep perceiving as bullying not only against an elderly member of our communities, but against anyone concerned. I think this situation says *a lot* about what has been going on in Debian's governance for the past, err, 4 years or so? including the dust-storm sweeping this thread, which is about a precise issue. And that is why - maybe wrongly so as Martijn points - I'm very nervous. ciao _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng