On 08/09/19 07:37, fsmithred via Dng wrote: > On 9/7/19 1:33 PM, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "fsmithred via Dng" >> <dng@lists.dyne.org> >> To: "dng" <dng@lists.dyne.org> >> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 9:23 AM >> Subject: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll) >> >> >>> In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on >>> libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) >>> >>> The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in >>> buster. >>> >>> The version in buster depends on libpam-systemd OR libpam-elogind. >>> (Also libsystemd0 OR libelogind0) Since we have libpam-elogind and >>> libelogind0 in the repos, we don't really need to devuanize udisks2 >>> anymore. Do we? >>> >>> Does anyone use udisks2 who doesn't want libpam-elogind or >>> libelogind0 with it? >>> >>> fsmithred (looking to reduce the work load) >>> >> >> I use udisks2, but I also use libpam-elogind and libelogind0 >> >> Right now I am needing this update to install other packages. >> >> Best Regards >> -- >> Ismael >> > > Thanks. > > Things are moving slowly now, and I have no idea when we will get the > newer version into the repo. For now, I suggest you download udisks2 and > libudisks2-0 from packages.debian.org and install them manually. > https://packages.debian.org/buster/udisks2 > > If you wait for us, you'll get the exact same packages, only it will be > later. > > fsmithred
fsmithred - do we need to drop udisks2 forked package from unstable and beowulf? -- Daniel Reurich Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd. 021 797 722
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng