On 10/24/13 4:34 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <0liowmcyyk....@wjh.hardakers.net>, Wes Hardaker writes:
Pretty much ditto what else was said: it's good and should be published.
But, I believe we can't include MUST NOT statements in the abstract
(last I checked) so that'll need to be changed.
It is a quote not a instruction. Additionally there are no reserved
words in the draft. There is no reference to RFC 2119.
It also confused the datatracker nit checker until I realized it was a
quote.
I thought of several ways of wordsmithing those paragraphs to avoid the
quote, but they all sounded worse.
tim
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
