On 7/6/2017 1:40 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
Michael StJohns <m...@nthpermutation.com> writes:
I'm sure you think that... but the small changes you've made to
address some of my comments haven't gone far enough. There's also a
need for a grammar and syntax pass on the document.
Thanks for the review and suggested text (the previous messages you sent
didn't provide as many concrete fixes, so we can now incorporate you
exact issues now that they're more directed). We'll try to put together
an update to address the issues you've pointed out shortly (which really
can't happen till Monday of IETF since we're after cut-off).
I didn't provide concrete fixes because the general model was missing
the point and the re-write could have been substantial. Now we're
finally on the same page that this only applies to "exclusively signing
with the new keys" we can make progress. It wasn't until this last
version that you'd adopted those changes.
Later, mike
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
