The IESG has approved the following document: - 'YANG Types for DNS Classes and Resource Record Types' (draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-05.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Robert Wilton. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang/ Technical Summary This document introduces the YANG module "iana-dns-class-rr-type" that contains derived types reflecting two IANA registries: DNS CLASSes and Resource Record (RR) TYPEs. These YANG types are intended as a minimum basis for future data modeling work. Working Group Summary There were several discussions during the working group process, but they were all resolved. Special attention is addressed to the IANA registration process, see also the IANA Considerations section. Instead of giving examples in the document, it is more procedural in its description. This has been chosen to ensure that, if there are changes in the IANA registration, the RFC does not give any obsolete examples and be misleading for software implementers who do not ultimately look at the IANA registry. Document Quality This document is seen as a fundamental building block for future RFCs in the DNSOP WG that intend to use YANG and NETCONF for DNS provisioning. The authors and the WG participants involved were well knowledgable with regard to YANG and NETCONF. The reviewers who have done a thorough review are Paul Wouters, Normen Kowalewski and Bob Harold, in addition to other DNSOP participants who have given the document during different phases feedback. There was also an early review by IANA. All seemed to be in order, but there were some comments about the XSLT stylesheet in Annex A, namely (not) remove it at the publication of the RFC. The authors/reviewers prefer to keep the XSLT-style sheet because they do not expect changes to the style sheet (and if so, it is appropriate to go through the IETF process again). It has been agreed to revisit this during the Last Call to see what others think. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop