Ok, I'll wait until you figure out where this is going. I may play
around anyway, just to figure out argouml.

Actually I was going to use argouml; I don't have any budget to buy
togetherj. I have heard great things about it though.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of bob
mcwhirter
Sent: October 13, 2001 4:17 PM
To: Dave Cramer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [droolers] Future Directions


> I finally had some time to look at this in detail. While I can't say I

> understand it completely yet I do understand enough to see that it 
> looks pretty good so far.
> 
> I was going to do the UML class diagram's for it; but you mentioned 
> that you might abandon the current implementation for JEOPS.
> 
> Let me know which way you are headed, I don't want to document 
> something that isn't going to be used

I'm not 100% certain at this point.

Chances are, I'll probably re-start with JEOPS as the base, and re-write
1/2 of it.  Then, I'll rewrite the other 1/2, ending in a new product.

The conflict I'm having is that if The Day Job wants a rules engine, and
I write one for them, it's closed source, which is Bad.

If I start with JEOPS, which is LGPLd, then the thing I write will also
be LGPLd.  Which means its open-source, of course.  And as 
licenses go, LGPL for a library is acceptable to me.

Basically, I can't directly work on drools under the BSD license without
creating a conflict-of-interest with the Day Job at this point.

And JEOPS has done some nice stuff, honestly.  No point in re-inventing
the wheel.  Though, getting interpreted rules as opposed to compiled
rules is definitely at the top of my agenda.  As is swapping ArrayList
for the Vectors, etc.

I have a feeling that at least the public API will morph to being
basically what you see in drools currently.

So, I wouldn't spend too much effort documenting the current code-base.

btw, you using TogetherJ or similar to document into UML?  TogetherJ
rocks my world.

        -bob


_______________________________________________
drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest



_______________________________________________
drools-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest

Reply via email to