Hokie dokie.
Day Job hasn't bought into the rules-engine idea Just Yet, so I'm going
to proceed down the drools path as 100% new development.
Due to .Net considerations and such, I *will* make the rule parser a
modular component. As long as something implements Parser, and builds
expression trees correctly, any language may be used.
Initially, I'm going to take a step back, and just implement the first
language to be roughly Java, similar to JEOPS.
Once we have a developer-friendly language, we can asses the situation,
and work on creating an idiot^H^H^H^H^H^H management-friendly language.
Regarding compilation of rules, I think we can handle that as well,
for allowing an unmodifiable, static rules base. Maybe.
-bob
_______________________________________________
drools-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
