l33tness?! - l33tness sucks. I think sort | uniq is more unixy and therefor better :)
2008/4/10 Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-04-10, 11:02): > > > > actually 'sort | uniq' is not (much) slower > > (at least i couldn't measure any difference on my linux setup) > > Yeah, but it's got a negative l33tness factor and uses up four more > bytes in writing not mentioning the evil forking :). > > -- > [a] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFH/dw7L69KEesxVYMRAuYbAJ4/xpYKTuKDN7MR4l57BLs2ei9ozgCcDDz2 > XGSPpjd+paOwuW2aA2yO2w4= > =bOfm > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)
