Yes Ron it should be good if the same criteria could be also used with the P5 operations. No papers no credit. If P5 was approved without papers why 7O1YGF need to send any kind of "papers" to be accepted ?? That!s the point in evidence here as far as I know. Did you or anybody in this list ever saw any authorization, any licence any papers from North Korea authorities for any of the P5 operations ???
Fred - PY7ZZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Notarius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <dx-chat@njdxa.org> Cc: "Mome Z32ZM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 5:24 PM Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] 7O1YGF License? > Mome, > > I am relieved to hear that the 7O1YGF license actually exists! Now, can you > have your sources send a copy of the actual license to Newington? I know > for a fact that upon the arrival of that license copy, which will clear up > once and for all the question of whether or not 7O1YGF had proper authority > to operate, that the operation will be approved and all will be well. > > You see, there's a little problem with the (for lack of a better term) > conspriacy theory regarding the to-date non-approval situation with 7O1YGF. > Everyone screaming bloody murder seems to be under the impression that there > is some mysterious or malevelont force (sometimes located in Maryland, > sometimes in Newington, sometimes somewhere in California, or sometimes in > Scandinavia and/or other points depending on the politcal slant of the > theorist telling the tale) standing in the way of this one counting. But if > you ask one of the guys up in Newington, they'll tell you a slightly > different story -- they WANT to count this one, and have tried to figure out > a way to do so to date. But without a license or other proof of proper > authorization... they can't. > > ...and no, I can't say in a public post who my source is, as it could put > said individual in an uncomfortable position, and I have too much respect > for said individual to do so. > > The bottom line with this operation is very simple: If (as many claim) the > license exists, produce it. End discussion. > > 73, ron wn3vaw > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mome Z32ZM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "NJDXA DXR" <dx-news@njdxa.org> > Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 1:06 PM > Subject: Re: [DX-NEWS] P5 > > >>>>clip<<<< > > > > Who says OR who know that 7O1YGF licence is signed by wrong person? > > 7O1YGF original Licence EXIST & All other rules are filled. > > Recognizing of this DXPN is not good ONLY for "some-one". > > I insure You & others that 7O1YGF is more REGULAR than mni others, > > especially from P5/4L4FN. > >>>>clip<<<< > > > > 73,GL&DX!!! de: MOME - Z32ZM > > http://www.qsl.net/z32zm > > > > Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems > http://njdxa.org/dx-chat > > To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org > > This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA > http://njdxa.org > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.2 - Release Date: 04/03/05 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.2 - Release Date: 04/03/05 Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
