In a post to EDSTAT-L, you wrote: >I believe you will find that most researchers in the sciences >accept the p-value as religion. In the report of the recent >British study on Type 2 diabetes, there was an effect which >was stated as "unimportant" because the p-value was .052. Do you have a citation for this. It sounds like an excellent teaching example. Steve Simon, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Standard Disclaimer. STATS: STeve's Attempt to Teach Statistics. http://www.cmh.edu/stats ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ =================================================================
- Re: questions on hypothesis Gene Gallagher
- Re: questions on hypothesis Donald Macnaughton
- Re: questions on hypothesis Chris . Chambers
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis Donald Burrill
- Re: questions on hypothesis Rich Ulrich
- Re: questions on hypothesis Ting Ting
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis David Heiser
- Re: questions on hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: questions on hypothesis Simon, Steve, PhD
- Re: questions on hypothesis Peter Lewycky
- Re: questions on hypothesis chris_david_c
- Re: questions on hypothesis dennis roberts
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: questions on hypothesis Chris . Chambers
- Re: questions on hypothesis Herman Rubin
- Re: questions on hypothesis David Heiser
- Re: questions on hypothesis dennis roberts
- Re: questions on hypothesis Robert J. MacG. Dawson