Hi Brett,

My personal preference when looking at the response of any filter is to use a RF Spectrum Analyzer and a tracking signal generator. When it comes to looking at the response of IF filters already built into a receiver the tracking generator can work at the antenna frequency rather than at IF, which makes the generator - pad - receiver connection easy to make, provided that the front end selective circuits have no effect on the measurement of the IF filter i.e.their working bandwidth is >>> IF filter bandwidth. The penalty is that the input of the Spectrum Analyzer needs to be connected to the IF strip at some point before the product detector, and everything after this point has to be disconnected unless the working bandwidth of this part which follows is >>> IF filter bandwidth, *or* has no effect on the measurement. One also has to ensure that the Spectrum Analyzer and its connecting cable are transparent to the cascade under measurement, a high impedance probe helps. AGC has to be OFF of course if the AGC system could be active. Spectrogram does not require this fiddling, AGC must be OFF, but being in effect a Spectrum Analyzer working at audio it gives a limited view - about 20kHz IIRC. What I like about using a RF Spectrum Analyzer and tracking generator is that a cleaner picture is produced without fuzzy noise at the top, and it is possible to sweep over a wide bandwidth to view the ears and spurious responses of the filter. It is also usually possible to see those other unwanted responses caused by radiated feedback or coupling via pcb traces etc.

It could be argued that Spectrogram is easier to use for routine alignment, but has limitations for use as a diagnostic tool.

73,

Geoff
GM4ESD




_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to