On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:58:09 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
<lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> said:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> > static int
> > _ecore_main_select(double timeout)
> > {
> > @@ -625,18 +848,10 @@
> > FD_ZERO(&exfds);
> >
> > /* call the prepare callback for all handlers */
> > + _ecore_main_prepare_handlers();
> > #ifndef HAVE_EPOLL
> > EINA_INLIST_FOREACH(fd_handlers, fdh)
> > {
> > - if ((!fdh->delete_me) && (fdh->prep_func))
> > - {
> > - fdh->references++;
> > - fdh->prep_func(fdh->prep_data, fdh);
> > - fdh->references--;
> > - }
> > - }
>
> Is _ecore_main_prepare_handlers() outside of #ifndef HAVE_EPOLL on
> purpose now or just a mistake?
>
> How much is this stuff tested? Mike, could you write some simple tests
> to fill in ecore test suite?
tested - on and off with and without epoll.
--
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
