On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote: > On 01/04/12 18:06, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> gustavo seems to very much disagree :) > > Gustavo has his own motives... Though for real, we discussed about it in > IRC (he and I) and I pointed out some API flaws I found just by playing > with the API. I'm not saying it's awful and should never get in, I'm > just saying it's not ready atm. It needs more review, more playing time > and more usage. And heck, some unit tests... > > Even now there are some FIXME in the code about changing API (e.g: order > of calling of interface functions with interface inheritance). > > Also, it's not really needed by anything in the EFL at the moment, so > there really is no need to rush it in. I would have understood the need > for rushing if it was a blocker for something, but it's not, it's just a > random feature...
if there's plans to change API, then I agree with Tom, it must be postponed. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
