On 09/28/2012 12:28 PM, rustyBSD wrote: > Le 28/09/2012 09:04, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit : >>> Can you please revert your changes ? >> why? its better than the code that was there (your patch). your patch did >> this: >> >> 1. find out size of file >> 2. alloc memory for ENTIRE file >> 3. fill buffer with random data or 0xff >> 4. write whole buffer in 1 write call >> 5. fsync the file >> >> this will be JUSt as slow and blocking as the code there now, except the code >> now doesn't need as much memory. if it was a 2gb file u'd need 2gb of ram or >> it'd fail. now it needs a fixed 64k. >> >> so why revert it? it's an improvement. > You fucking don't understand what i told. > > I told that > > I HAVE ALREADY MADE A PATCH WHICH DOES A BETTER JOB > THAN YOURS, AND THAT I'M JUST WAITING FOR VTORRI > > Isn't that fucking clear ?
But why aren't the patches sent to the mailing list? There are others than vtorri which can commit simple patches like these. S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
