On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:42:54 +0400 Igor Murzov <[email protected]> said:

> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:00:45 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:21:15 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > <[email protected]> said:
> > 
> > > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:54:14 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz
> > > > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> said:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > > > <[email protected]<javascript:;>
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:18:41 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz
> > > > > > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> said:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ah, how quickly bets are made against me the instant I leave the
> > > > country.
> > > > > > > my league of admirers is always so reliable!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > distcheck is always run before a release. always.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > then how did it pass when the edje_cc in the 1.7 branch literally
> > > > > > did crash in
> > > > > > this scenario - it wasnt random. it literally was ALWAYS a strcmp
> > > > against
> > > > > > NULL...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I said previously that I run the stable branch at work; I'm not at
> > > > work.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > aaaah so you didn't distcheck this one against stable branch?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm on vacation, bedridden most of the time with the German Plague
> > > > > and a fever so high that the top of it can't be seen from the peak of
> > > > > Mt. Everest. Despite this, I managed to drag myself to my computer to
> > > > > try and do a release.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would appreciate greatly if people could stop being less negative
> > > > > and critical, and instead focus more on being both productive and
> > > > constructive.
> > > >
> > > > fair enough - i just never expected this should even get through if you
> > > > are building/testing against 1.7 - since you are not right now that dos
> > > > create some
> > > > issues and changes expectations that you are testing against that. :)
> > > 
> > > How about you, Raster? Are you able to test with 1.7.x? You've mentioned
> > > this edje_cc bug and the Evas leaks. Anything else that is know but
> > > pending to be debugged in EFL (leaks, crashes) or we can do a 1.7.2?
> > 
> > i have everything from trunk at this stage. i dont have 1 machine - i have
> > 7 of them. i would have to clear up and set up all of them to use and build
> > form branches, write some scripts etc. and i havent done that at this
> > stage. the leaks were in both trunk and branch. the edje_cc was a
> > non-ported patch (and we wouldn't have found it if all of us used branches
> > - so its GOOD some use 1.7, some use trunk).
> > 
> > i have 50 mails on e-devel that include patches, bugfixes nd issues etc.
> > that MAY apply to 1.7.x too - and i simply haven't had the time to review
> > the, so there may be pending things that need to go into a 1.7.2
> > 
> > here's a list of them from e-devel (subjects so u can search for them):
> > 
> > Subject: [E-devel] elm flip (1.7.x) issue
> > Subject: [E-devel]  Proxy Image
> > Subject: [E-devel] eina_share_common, eina_bench patches
> 
> > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH][E] Unbreak getting Nth element from boxes.
> 
> Fixed by zmike already.

cool

> > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH][Ecore] Fixes for invalid memory read issues
> > discovered by cppcheck
> 
> > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH][Ecore,Edje,E,E-Modules-Extra] Fix typos.
> 
> All patches in this mail are in.

in the above subject's mail - or all subject lines? listed here?

> 
> -- Igor
> 
> > Subject: [E-devel] Deprecated/missing function to get object item's view?
> > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH] [EVAS] evas_object_key_grab add check for same
> > modifiers
> > Subject: [E-devel] E-devel] [PATCH] [ELEMENTARY]
> > elm_fileselector_entry_inwin_mode_set doc fix
> > Subject: Re: [E-devel] [Patch] [Elementary] [Entry] Clear selection when
> > entry loses focus
> > Subject: [E-devel] [Patch] [Elementary] Documentation update for gengrid
> > Subject: [E-devel] [Patch][edje] Prevent duplicated inherition of "after"
> > Subject: [E-devel]  EVAS_CALLBACK_MOUSE_UP callback is not called.
> > Subject: Re: [E-devel] [Patch][Elementary]Genlist: Fix anchor item to
> > prevent scroller movement
> > Subject: [E-devel] [Edje/Ecore]SIGSEGV on BSD's
> > Subject: [E-devel] eina benchmark and eina_file patches
> > Subject: [E-devel] [patch][elementary][entry] Hide copy/paste menu if there
> > is no selection
> > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH] Edje: invalidate double named group
> > Subject: [E-devel] 2 steps eina_share_common_del speed up
> > Subject: [E-devel] elm_flip unexpected behavior
> > 
> > that's a quick browse through my backlog finding the ones that bring up
> > possible/probably bugs or have patches/fixes that need looking at.
> > 
> > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:06:54 +0100 Vincent Torri <
> > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > said:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:21:53 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > > > > > > > >> <[email protected]> said:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> > This is bad. Either do 1.7.2 before next alpha, or at
> > > > > > > > > >> > least
> > > > > > > > 1.7.2-alpha1
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > We really want people to test with the exactly same
> > > > software.
> > > > > > > > That's the
> > > > > > > > > >> > way to avoid problems like this one, it should never ever
> > > > > > happened
> > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > >> this
> > > > > > > > > >> > point!
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > Wasn't discomfitor running from stable EFL to avoid these
> > > > > > issues?
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> he's runing from the 1.7 branch - which is what will be
> > > > 1.7.2...
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > >> didnt have the fix until i added it today. the alpha
> > > > > > > > > >> shouldnt
> > > > have
> > > > > > > > passed
> > > > > > > > > >> "make
> > > > > > > > > >> distcheck".
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > running from the branch isn't enough. he must run from the
> > > > > > > > > > last
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > tarball to be sure he has exactly the same as other users.
> > > > > > > > > > If
> > > > there
> > > > > > > > need to
> > > > > > > > > > be a fix in EFL before next alpha, he must firstly release
> > > > > > > > > > new
> > > > EFL
> > > > > > > > snapshot
> > > > > > > > > > or release, then get E17 on top of that.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > this is the only way to assure users will be able to
> > > > > > > > > > compile.
> > > > I'm
> > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > > > picky here because we're at alpha4 already, very close to
> > > > > > > > > > end
> > > > and
> > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > > > kind of things were not expected to happen. But you know,
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > default
> > > > > > > > theme
> > > > > > > > > > is far from complete and thus the development may introduce
> > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > breakages... then I recommend you, the theme maker, to also
> > > > run the
> > > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > > setup.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > as for make distcheck, I have no idea... likely he did not
> > > > > > > > > > run
> > > > it?
> > > > > > How
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > the alpha release procedure going on? Just make distcheck
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > it's
> > > > > > > > gold?
> > > > > > > > > > Asking more folks at #edevelop to give it a try to tarballs
> > > > before
> > > > > > > > doing
> > > > > > > > > > the announcement?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I agree. Especially for other distro like the BSD
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > i'll put money on the fact that no other distros or os's are
> > > > checked..
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > given alpha4 came out.. make distcheck wasn't used as edje_cc
> > > > > > > > wil
> > > > have
> > > > > > > > segv's
> > > > > > > > failing it.
> > > > > > > >
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to