On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:30:48 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:14:07 -0500 Doug Newgard > <[email protected]> said: > > > Edje isn't the problem. Lua upstream does not provide pkg-config > > files, so they are added by each distro. Unfortunately, each distro > > does it differently, so when there's an update and a new pkg-config > > file, every build system for every program that uses it has to be > > updated. It's a ridiculous situation IMO. > > yes. in fact lua-upstream dont want a system liblua at all. they want > every project to copy lua into its srcbase and not share a library. > > it's tempting to consider moving to luajit some day... especially now > its much more mature with more architecture support. More than just tempting, we already talked about it and I'm running experiments. Remember? B-) -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. Visit us today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
