Hello, On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Thanatermesis <thanatermesis.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > what about having an option like?: --enable-xembed (makes traditional > systray to work in a ugly way) > > and so having it disabled by default, but optional for who needs it > > i personally think that if we restrict some usabilities, ppl will move to, > let's say kde or gnome just because "it makes its needs working"
They wont go to KDE for that purpose : https://plus.google.com/+MartinGr%C3%A4%C3%9Flin/posts/7YpzTNC3WF6 I think it is a very good opportunity for all desktop environment to phase it out. Everyone agree everywhere that it is broken. Only a few application resist doing the change. The more environment there is that doesn't work for them the more they will be forced into fixing their application. So I am also all for permanently phasing it out, no matter the cost ! If you have application requiring xembed, open a bug on the application side to move away from it. That's the best course of action. You have time until the release of E20... > 2014-11-04 12:52 GMT+01:00 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com>: > >> On 04/11/14 11:00, Michael Hughes wrote: >> > In Fedora, installing "libappindicator" and "libappindicator-gtk3" makes >> > the Network Manager Applet work without Xembed but the systray is all >> > messed up. The first app loaded works properly but when you load >> > additional apps, you get distorted and overlapping icons which do not go >> > away entirely when the app is closed. Restarting E fixes the current >> > problems but everything goes South again the next time you make any >> > change to the systray. At any rate, it works a lot better with Xembed. >> > AppIndicator probably needs more work before Xembed is eliminated. >> >> Please report bugs. The thing about appindicator is that it's very easy >> to debug and solve (compared to xembed). >> >> -- >> Tom. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> enlightenment-devel mailing list >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
