The default argument should probably just be an iterable. On Feb 12, 2012 4:50 PM, "Oliver Hunt" <oli...@apple.com> wrote:
> I saw a reference to it being modified to take an array(-like?) as a > parameter. While I can see an argument in favour of a single array > argument I can also see using a set of parameters that initially populate > the set. We just shouldn't allow both (and introduce another version of > the horror that is the Array constructor). > > With the existence of the spread operator I think that there's a good > argument in favour of the multiple parameters approach. > > --Oliver > > On Feb 12, 2012, at 4:33 PM, Peter Michaux wrote: > > > In the proposal, the Set constructor takes no arguments. > > > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:simple_maps_and_sets > > > > Could it take a list of initial elements to be included in the set? > > > > var s = new Set('alpha', 'beta'); > > s.has('alpha'); // true > > > > I think this is a lot better than the verbosity that is > > > > var s = new Set(); > > s.add('alpha'); > > s.add('beta'); > > > > > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > es-discuss@mozilla.org > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
